Calibration (accuracy) has been traditionally required by ISO 9001, but measurement systems analysis (precision) has not – although it has been an element of the automotive standard IATF 16949 ever since the latter was QS 9000. Accuracy and precision are both, however, necessary to obtain reliable measurements of critical to quality (CTQ) characteristics. Attendees will learn the implications of measurement systems analysis (MSA) with regard to outgoing quality, estimation of process performance indices, and statistical process control, and how to perform and assess a MSA.
Areas Covered in the Session :
- Know the difference between accuracy, as ensured by calibration, and precision, as assessed from a MSA.
- Know how gage variation, a function of repeatability and reproducibility (R&R, alternatively equipment variation and appraiser variation respectively), affects outgoing quality, process performance estimation, and statistical process control.
- The chance of accepting nonconforming work, and rejecting good work, increases near the specification limit(s).
- If gage variation is built into the estimate of process variation, the estimated process performance index will be lower.
- Gage variation is included in the estimate of variation for statistical process control, which means the control limits will be wider and less able to detect genuine process shifts. The false alarm rate will not, however, increase.
- Basic directions are provided for StatGraphics and Minitab, and the handout adds instructions for Microsoft Excel.
Attendees will also receive an Excel spreadsheet with the d*2 factors that are required for the average and range method. These appear in some references that are named in the handout, but they are not as widely available as the traditional control chart factors.
Who Should Attend:
- Quality Departments
- Manufacturing Departments
- Engineering Departments
- Production Departments
- Quality Technicians and Inspectors
- Everyone with responsibility for dimensional measurements